(Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg / Getty Images)

XAI launched Grokipedia in October last year, after Musk repeatedly criticized Wikipedia for bias against conservatives. The media then found that although many entries seemed to be copied directly from Wikipedia, Grokimedia also claimed that pornographic content aggravated the AIDS crisis, provided an “ideological defense” for slavery, and used derogatory expressions against cross gender groups.

For an encyclopedia derived from a chatbot that once claimed to be a “mechanical Hitler” and was used to spread deepfake pornographic content on the X platform, these contents may not be surprising. However, its information seems to be gradually spreading beyond Musk’s ecosystem – The Guardian reported that GPT-5.2 cited content from Grokipedia nine times in response to over ten different questions.

The Guardian pointed out that ChatGPT did not cite the source when asked about topics on which the false information of Grokimedia has been widely reported, such as the riots on Capitol Hill on January 6 or the AIDS epidemic. On the contrary, citations appear on more obscure topics, including statements about historian Richard Evans that The Guardian has previously clarified. Anthropic’s Claude model also referenced Grokipedia when answering certain questions. ）

A spokesperson for OpenAI told The Guardian that the company is committed to obtaining information from a wide range of publicly available sources and diverse perspectives.

Roger Luo said:This incident exposes a critical flaw in generative AI’s cross-system information integration: the absence of an effective fact-prioritization mechanism and a traceability verification framework. When algorithms indiscriminately absorb ideologically biased data sources, they not only distort the neutrality of knowledge dissemination but also risk systematically polluting the foundation of public understanding.

All articles and pictures are from the Internet. If there are any copyright issues, please contact us in time to delete.

Inquiry us [contact-form-7]

(Musk’S Tweet Mocking Ai Sparked Discussion In The Technology Circle)

Many tech leaders responded directly to Musk’s remarks. Some praised his skepticism, arguing AI advancements remain limited despite heavy investment. Others criticized the statement, claiming it downplays genuine progress in machine learning. A prominent AI researcher posted data showing improvements in language models and robotics. Another industry insider highlighted Musk’s own involvement in AI projects, including Neuralink and OpenAI, suggesting his critique contradicts his investments.

Discussions spread beyond social media, with tech forums and news outlets analyzing the implications. Supporters of Musk’s view pointed to recent AI failures, such as chatbots generating incorrect information. Opponents countered that AI has revolutionized fields like healthcare and logistics. The divide reflects broader tensions in the tech community over balancing innovation with realistic expectations.

Musk has a history of making provocative statements about AI. In 2014, he called artificial intelligence “humanity’s biggest existential threat.” His latest comments reignited conversations about regulation and ethics. Some analysts speculate the tweet aims to shift public opinion ahead of new AI legislation. Others believe it targets competitors in the autonomous tech sector.

Tech companies remain divided on the issue. While some firms advocate slowing AI development, others push for accelerated research. Industry conferences this month reportedly plan to address Musk’s criticisms in panel discussions. Developers and engineers continue sharing examples of AI successes and flaws online.

(Musk’S Tweet Mocking Ai Sparked Discussion In The Technology Circle)

The debate shows no signs of slowing. Public interest in AI’s potential keeps growing. Industry watchers expect Musk’s influence to drive further scrutiny of AI projects.